DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo S60 vs 2013 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda MPV
VolvoMakeMazda
S60ModelMPV
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda MPV
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque203 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda MPV
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank75 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda MPV
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
—Tyre size215/55 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda MPV
4628 mmLength4870 mm
1865 mmWidth1850 mm
1484 mmHeight1685 mm
1582 KgWeight—
2776 mmWheelbase2950 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo S60 and 2013 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…