2011 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.0 D3 (163 Hp) 2011Overall Score67.75/100
2011 Volvo S60 vs 2011 Brilliance M3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Brilliance
M3
Brilliance M3 1.8i R4 16V Turbo (170 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Brilliance M3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationBrilliance M3
VolvoMakeBrilliance
S60ModelM3
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationBrilliance M3
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
163 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque235 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationBrilliance M3
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationBrilliance M3
4628 mmLength—
1865 mmWidth—
1484 mmHeight—
1582 KgWeight—
2776 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Volvo S60 and 2011 Brilliance M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Brilliance M3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…