DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo S60 vs 2010 Brilliance M2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeBrilliance
S60ModelM2
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
163 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque235 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption14,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4628 mmLength4648 mm
1865 mmWidth1800 mm
1484 mmHeight1450 mm
1582 KgWeight1455 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo S60 and 2010 Brilliance M2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…