2001 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 3.8 V6 (243 Hp) 2001Overall Score70.75/100
2001 Buick Regal vs 1999 Holden Commodore Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 3.8 i V6 S (233 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Buick Regal
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
BuickMakeHolden
RegalModelCommodore
2001Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
6,8 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
220 km/hTop speed226 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
243 HPPower233 HP
380 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick RegalSpecificationHolden Commodore
4983 mmLength4884 mm
1847 mmWidth1842 mm
1438 mmHeight1450 mm
1645 KgWeight1670 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase2788 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Buick Regal and 1999 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…