DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo S40 vs 2009 Landwind SUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeLandwind
S40ModelSUV
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2800 cc
140 HPPower92 HP
220 NmTorque205 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4468 mmLength4800 mm
1770 mmWidth1800 mm
1452 mmHeight1750 mm
1368 KgWeight1935 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo S40 and 2009 Landwind SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…