1997 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 3.8 V6 (243 Hp) 1997Overall Score69.75/100
1997 Buick Regal vs 1997 Ford Econoline Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Econoline
Ford Econoline 4.2 i V6 (197 Hp) 1997Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Ford Econoline
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Econoline
BuickMakeFord
RegalModelEconoline
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Econoline
6,8 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
243 HPPower197 HP
380 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Econoline
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank132 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Econoline
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears4
225/60 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Buick RegalSpecificationFord Econoline
4983 mmLength5382 mm
1847 mmWidth2014 mm
1438 mmHeight2050 mm
1645 KgWeight2370 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase3505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Buick Regal and 1997 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…