1996 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 16V (140 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.5/100
1996 Volvo S40 vs 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mercedes-Benz
E Serisi
Mercedes-Benz E Serisi 124.079) 1996Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationMercedes-Benz E Serisi
VolvoMakeMercedes-Benz
S40ModelE Serisi
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationMercedes-Benz E Serisi
9,3 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
210 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
183 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationMercedes-Benz E Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank72 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationMercedes-Benz E Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationMercedes-Benz E Serisi
4483 mmLength4765 mm
1717 mmWidth1765 mm
1411 mmHeight1490 mm
1288 KgWeight1470 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo S40 and 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…