DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo S40 vs 1996 Fiat Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFiat
S40ModelTempra
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1756 cc
90 HPPower101 HP
176 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4354 mm
1720 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1445 mm
1225 KgWeight1168 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo S40 and 1996 Fiat Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…