2000 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.9 D (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Volvo S40 vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-6
Mazda MX-6 2.0 i 16V (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-6
VolvoMakeMazda
S40ModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-6
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
195 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
265 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-6
4516 mmLength4615 mm
1716 mmWidth1750 mm
1422 mmHeight1310 mm
1295 KgWeight1120 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volvo S40 and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…