DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo S40 vs 2004 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationRover 25
VolvoMakeRover
S40Model25
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationRover 25
10,9 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
165 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationRover 25
4476 mmLength3990 mm
1770 mmWidth1688 mm
1454 mmHeight1419 mm
1295 KgWeight1135 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo S40 and 2004 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…