DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo S40 vs 2004 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZR
VolvoMakeMG
S40ModelZR
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZR
10,9 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
165 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZR
4476 mmLength4011 mm
1770 mmWidth1690 mm
1454 mmHeight1400 mm
1295 KgWeight1070 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo S40 and 2004 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…