DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo S40 vs 2003 Volkswagen Beetle Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Beetle

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
S40ModelBeetle
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
122 HPPower116 HP
174 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4516 mmLength4081 mm
1716 mmWidth1725 mm
1422 mmHeight1500 mm
1230 KgWeight1230 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo S40 and 2003 Volkswagen Beetle approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Beetle leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…