DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo S40 vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZT
VolvoMakeMG
S40ModelZT
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZT
10,5 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
122 HPPower116 HP
174 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationMG ZT
4516 mmLength4740 mm
1716 mmWidth1780 mm
1422 mmHeight1410 mm
1230 KgWeight1535 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo S40 and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…