DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Volvo S40 vs 2001 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
S40ModelCarisma
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
122 HPPower115 HP
174 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4516 mmLength4475 mm
1716 mmWidth1710 mm
1422 mmHeight1405 mm
1230 KgWeight1265 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Volvo S40 and 2001 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…