DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo S40 vs 2011 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationFiat Bravo
VolvoMakeFiat
S40ModelBravo
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationFiat Bravo
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank57 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationFiat Bravo
4468 mmLength4336 mm
1770 mmWidth1792 mm
1452 mmHeight1498 mm
1235 KgWeight1320 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo S40 and 2011 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…