DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Buick Regal vs 1996 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
RegalModelExplorer
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
208 HPPower160 HP
312 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank66 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4 HydramaticGears5
205/70 R15Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4536 mm
1842 mmWidth1783 mm
1354 mmHeight1714 mm
1491 KgWeight1807 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Buick Regal and 1996 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…