DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Buick Regal vs 1995 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
RegalModelEconoline
1995Model year1995
CoupeBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
208 HPPower197 HP
312 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank132 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears4
205/70 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4925 mmLength5382 mm
1842 mmWidth2014 mm
1354 mmHeight2050 mm
1491 KgWeight2370 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Buick Regal and 1995 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…