DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo C70 vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeLand Rover
C70ModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
230 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
193 HPPower177 HP
270 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/50 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4433 mm
1820 mmWidth1809 mm
1410 mmHeight1709 mm
1450 KgWeight1550 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo C70 and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…