DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Volvo C70 vs 2002 Toyota Crown Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeToyota
C70ModelCrown
2001Model year2002
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
240 HPPower280 HP
330 NmTorque250 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4820 mm
1820 mmWidth1765 mm
1410 mmHeight1455 mm
1500 KgWeight1600 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Volvo C70 and 2002 Toyota Crown approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…