DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Buick Regal vs 1992 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

69.75–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeLand Rover
RegalModelRange Rover
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3947 cc
208 HPPower182 HP
312 NmTorque312 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank82 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption14,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4 HydramaticGears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4449 mm
1842 mmWidth1818 mm
1354 mmHeight1790 mm
1491 KgWeight1892 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Buick Regal and 1992 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…