DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo C70 vs 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cobalt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
C70ModelCobalt
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
225 HPPower205 HP
310 NmTorque230 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank49 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4580 mm
1820 mmWidth1725 mm
1410 mmHeight1415 mm
1570 KgWeight1274 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2624 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo C70 and 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cobalt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…