2000 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2.0 20V Turbo (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score70.75/100
2000 Volvo C70 vs 1999 Mitsubishi RVR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
RVR
Mitsubishi RVR 2.0 i 16V Turbo (230 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Volvo C70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
C70ModelRVR
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
7,9 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
225 HPPower230 HP
310 NmTorque343 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi RVR
4720 mmLength4280 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1650 mm
1570 KgWeight1570 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volvo C70 and 1999 Mitsubishi RVR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…