DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo C70 vs 1996 Caterham 21 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCaterham
C70Model21
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h5,0 s
245 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
225 HPPower190 HP
310 NmTorque203 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength3800 mm
1820 mmWidth1580 mm
1410 mmHeight1150 mm
1450 KgWeight650 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo C70 and 1996 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…