1996 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2.0 20V Turbo (225 Hp) 1996Overall Score69.75/100
1996 Volvo C70 vs 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 (160 Hp) 1992Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
C70ModelLancer
1996Model year1992
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
245 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
225 HPPower160 HP
310 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4720 mmLength4235 mm
1820 mmWidth1670 mm
1410 mmHeight1405 mm
1450 KgWeight1020 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2455 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo C70 and 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…