1996 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2.0 20V Turbo (225 Hp) 1996Overall Score69.75/100
1996 Volvo C70 vs 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mitsubishi
Eclipse
Mitsubishi Eclipse 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo (195 Hp) 1995Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Eclipse
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
C70ModelEclipse
1996Model year1995
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2+2
2Doors2
Performance
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
245 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
225 HPPower195 HP
310 NmTorque275 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C70SpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
4720 mmLength4390 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1321 mm
1450 KgWeight1403 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2470 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo C70 and 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Eclipse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…