DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo C70 vs 2002 Honda Stepwgn Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Stepwgn

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeHonda
C70ModelStepwgn
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats8
2Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
180 HPPower160 HP
220 NmTorque191 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4670 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1845 mm
1570 KgWeight1500 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo C70 and 2002 Honda Stepwgn approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Stepwgn leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…