DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo C30 vs 2009 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeHonda
C30ModelAccord
2009Model year2009
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
220 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
180 HPPower201 HP
350 NmTorque220 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4252 mmLength4750 mm
1782 mmWidth1840 mm
1447 mmHeight1470 mm
1479 KgWeight1702 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo C30 and 2009 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…