DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Volvo C30 vs 2007 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationSaab 9-3
VolvoMakeSaab
C30Model9-3
2007Model year2007
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationSaab 9-3
4252 mmLength4635 mm
1782 mmWidth1762 mm
1447 mmHeight1466 mm
1421 KgWeight1440 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Volvo C30 and 2007 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…