2006 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0D (136) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
2006 Volvo C30 vs 2006 Daewoo Magnus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Daewoo
Magnus
Daewoo Magnus 2.0 i 16V (132 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Magnus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationDaewoo Magnus
VolvoMakeDaewoo
C30ModelMagnus
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationDaewoo Magnus
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower132 HP
320 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationDaewoo Magnus
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationDaewoo Magnus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationDaewoo Magnus
4252 mmLength4770 mm
1782 mmWidth1815 mm
1447 mmHeight1440 mm
1421 KgWeight1305 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Volvo C30 and 2006 Daewoo Magnus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Magnus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…