2012 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 i 16V (145) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda CX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
C30ModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda CX-5
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
210 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower160 HP
185 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda CX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda CX-5
4252 mmLength4555 mm
1782 mmWidth1840 mm
1447 mmHeight1710 mm
1327 KgWeight1488 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSVolkswagen Multivan vs Volvo C302012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSToyota RAV4 vs Volvo C302012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSMazda CX-5 vs Volvo C302012 and 2012 model years
VSMercedes-Benz Viano vs Volvo C302012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Chairman vs Volvo C302012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…