2007 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 i 16V (145) 2007Overall Score62.5/100
2007 Volvo C30 vs 2007 Ford Maverick Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.3 i 16V AWD (150 Hp) 2007Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Ford Maverick
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Maverick
VolvoMakeFord
C30ModelMaverick
2007Model year2007
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Maverick
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
210 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
185 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Maverick
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Maverick
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Maverick
4252 mmLength4441 mm
1782 mmWidth1825 mm
1447 mmHeight1762 mm
1327 KgWeight1530 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Volvo C30 and 2007 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…