2006 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 i 16V (145) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
2006 Volvo C30 vs 2006 Mazda Tribute Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.3 i 16V (150 Hp) 2006Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda Tribute
VolvoMakeMazda
C30ModelTribute
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda Tribute
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
210 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
185 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda Tribute
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda Tribute
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/70 R16 99 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda Tribute
4252 mmLength4395 mm
1782 mmWidth1800 mm
1447 mmHeight1710 mm
1327 KgWeight1455 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Volvo C30 and 2006 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…