DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Honda Accord Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeHonda
C30ModelAccord
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2356 cc
177 HPPower188 HP
400 NmTorque245 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R17 94V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength4862 mm
1782 mmWidth1849 mm
1447 mmHeight1466 mm
1451 KgWeight1482 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Honda Accord approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…