2011 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2011Overall Score64.75/100
2011 Volvo C30 vs 2011 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (150 Hp) 2011Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
VolvoMakeFord
C30ModelRanger
2011Model year2011
CoupeBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
9,4 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque375 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationFord Ranger
4266 mmLength5359 mm
1782 mmWidth1850 mm
1447 mmHeight1815 mm
1450 KgWeight2048 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Volvo C30 and 2011 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…