2009 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 1.6 i 16V (100) 2009Overall Score57.25/100
2009 Volvo C30 vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet (90 Hp) 2009Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Volvo C30
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
VolvoMakeFiat
C30ModelBravo
2009Model year2009
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank57 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationFiat Bravo
4252 mmLength4336 mm
1782 mmWidth1792 mm
1447 mmHeight1498 mm
1279 KgWeight1320 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volvo C30 and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…