DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFord
C30ModelFusion
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1580 cc
114 HPPower90 HP
270 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength4013 mm
1782 mmWidth1724 mm
1447 mmHeight1543 mm
1354 KgWeight1105 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2486 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…