DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Mazda 5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 5
VolvoMakeMazda
C30Model5
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 5
11,3 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
114 HPPower115 HP
270 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 5
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 5
4266 mmLength4505 mm
1782 mmWidth1755 mm
1447 mmHeight1615 mm
1354 KgWeight1400 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Mazda 5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…