DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C5
VolvoMakeCitroen
C30ModelC5
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C5
11,3 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
114 HPPower120 HP
270 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C5
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank71 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EGS
—Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationCitroen C5
4266 mmLength4779 mm
1782 mmWidth1860 mm
1447 mmHeight1451-1458 mm
1354 KgWeight1425 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…