DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Buick Regal vs 2002 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
RegalModelMustang
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3813 cc
203 HPPower190 HP
305 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank58 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears4
215/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4983 mmLength4653 mm
1847 mmWidth1857 mm
1438 mmHeight1350 mm
1600 KgWeight1455 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Buick Regal and 2002 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…