DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Buick Regal vs 2002 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
RegalModelExplorer
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
203 HPPower155 HP
305 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank72 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears5
215/70 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4983 mmLength4429 mm
1847 mmWidth1783 mm
1438 mmHeight1714 mm
1600 KgWeight1671 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Buick Regal and 2002 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…