1992 • Volvo
960
Volvo 960 2.4 TD (115 Hp) 1992Overall Score65.25/100
1992 Volvo 960 vs 1992 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.6i (150 Hp) 1992Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Volvo 960
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 960SpecificationOpel Omega
VolvoMakeOpel
960ModelOmega
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo 960SpecificationOpel Omega
—0–100 km/h9,8 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2383 ccEngine displacement2594 cc
115 HPPower150 HP
225 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 960SpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
11 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 960SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo 960SpecificationOpel Omega
4871 mmLength4740 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1411 mmHeight1445 mm
1600 KgWeight1415 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Volvo 960 and 1992 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…