DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo 940 vs 1996 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
940ModelLaguna
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2383 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
122 HPPower113 HP
240 NmTorque168 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 VTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4508 mm
1750 mmWidth1752 mm
1411 mmHeight1432 mm
1440 KgWeight1255 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo 940 and 1996 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…