DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Volvo 940 vs 1993 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
VolvoMakeOpel
940ModelOmega
1993Model year1993
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
12,1 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2383 ccEngine displacement2410 cc
122 HPPower125 HP
240 NmTorque195 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 940SpecificationOpel Omega
4871 mmLength4740 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1411 mmHeight1445 mm
1440 KgWeight1330 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Volvo 940 and 1993 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…