DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Volvo 940 vs 1998 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeLand Rover
940ModelFreelander
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
210 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2316 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
165 HPPower177 HP
264 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/65 R15 VTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4433 mm
1750 mmWidth1809 mm
1411 mmHeight1709 mm
1385 KgWeight1550 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Volvo 940 and 1998 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…