1996 • Volvo
850
Volvo 850 2.5 TDI (140 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
1996 Volvo 850 vs 1996 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 2.5 D (136 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Volvo 850
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 850SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
VolvoMakeLand Rover
850ModelRange Rover
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo 850SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
9,9 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2461 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
290 NmTorque270 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 850SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
DieselFuel typeDiesel
73 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 850SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo 850SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4660 mmLength4713 mm
1761 mmWidth1853 mm
1415 mmHeight1817 mm
1457 KgWeight2115 Kg
2665 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo 850 and 1996 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 850 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…