1996 • Volvo
850
Volvo 850 2.0 10V (126 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Volvo 850 vs 1996 Honda Sm-x Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Honda
Sm-x
Honda Sm-x 2.0 i 16V (131 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Volvo 850
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
VolvoMakeHonda
850ModelSm-x
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
11,7 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
126 HPPower131 HP
170 NmTorque186 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,93 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,43 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo 850SpecificationHonda Sm-x
4660 mmLength3950 mm
1761 mmWidth1695 mm
1415 mmHeight1750 mm
1365 KgWeight1330 Kg
2665 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo 850 and 1996 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 850 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…