1992 • Volvo
480 E
Volvo 480 E 2.0 (109 Hp) 1992Overall Score56.25/100
1992 Volvo 480 E vs 1992 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 i (121 Hp) 1992Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Volvo 480 E
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 480 ESpecificationCitroen XM
VolvoMakeCitroen
480 EModelXM
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Volvo 480 ESpecificationCitroen XM
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
191 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
109 HPPower121 HP
165 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 480 ESpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 480 ESpecificationCitroen XM
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo 480 ESpecificationCitroen XM
4258 mmLength4710 mm
1710 mmWidth1795 mm
1323 mmHeight1385 mm
1050 KgWeight1310 Kg
2503 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Volvo 480 E and 1992 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 480 E leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…