DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Volvo 480 E vs 1994 Mitsubishi RVR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi RVR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
480 EModelRVR
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
3Doors4

Performance

220 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1761 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
122 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4290 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1625 mm
—Weight1210 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Volvo 480 E and 1994 Mitsubishi RVR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi RVR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…