1996 • Volvo
480 E
Volvo 480 E 1.7 Turbo (120 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.5/100
1996 Volvo 480 E vs 1996 Toyota Corona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Toyota
Corona
Toyota Corona 1.6i 16V EX (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Corona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 480 ESpecificationToyota Corona
VolvoMakeToyota
480 EModelCorona
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Volvo 480 ESpecificationToyota Corona
9,3 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1721 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
175 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 480 ESpecificationToyota Corona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo 480 ESpecificationToyota Corona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo 480 ESpecificationToyota Corona
4258 mmLength4520 mm
1710 mmWidth1695 mm
1323 mmHeight1410 mm
1079 KgWeight1090 Kg
2503 mmWheelbase2580 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo 480 E and 1996 Toyota Corona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Corona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…