DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Volvo 460 L vs 1992 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 460 L

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
460 LModelClio
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1721 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
102 HPPower88 HP
142 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank43 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength3709 mm
1686 mmWidth1616 mm
1378 mmHeight1395 mm
1030 KgWeight950 Kg
2503 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Volvo 460 L and 1992 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 460 L leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…